Talk:Bias ratio

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Behavioral![edit]

article mentions a very interesting behavioral fact: The “reserve” that allows “false positives” with regularity is evident in the unusual hump at the -1.5 Standard Deviation point

So when market returns are down significantly (1.5sigma here), everyone let's the "reality" catch up to their prior sins of smoothing! Could this line of thought apply to the "fat tails" spoken of by Nassim Taleb, interpreted here at 1.5sigma? In other words, some justification for existence of fat tails is the prevalence of widespread fraud? This leads us to: markets, reflecting human sins, are thus inherently unstable! Lots to chew on.

Kalm33 (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources (or lack thereof)[edit]

I read all the references, and it's not clear to me whence the technical description of bias ratio was gleaned. None of the cited sources (at least the freely available ones) provide any technical detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kstarsinic (talk • contribs) 13:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bias ratio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821210723/http://ieor.columbia.edu/seminars/financialengineering/2005-2006/spring/Abdulali_Adil/seminar.html to http://www.ieor.columbia.edu/seminars/financialengineering/2005-2006/spring/Abdulali_Adil/seminar.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation section[edit]

In paragraph 5 of the Explanation section, there are references to histograms which are not included on the Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eoliveri13 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]