Talk:Bedford Square

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unusual numbering[edit]

Is there any particular reason for this sentence being phrased like this:

"Numbers 1-10, 11, 12–27, 28–38 and 40–54 are grade I listed buildings."?

Surely that's just 1-38 and 40-54"? I admit it's been a while since I worked on Bedford Square, but as far as I recall the numbers are in order, rather than being all odd on one side and all even on the other (or anything like that). Should this be changed?Juicebox1 (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The buildings are described as per their individual listings. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?[edit]

Parts of the article look like WP:OR, as if someone has walked around the square making a note of who lives there. It would help to have some references! Sionk (talk) 22:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bedford Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]