Talk:Beatrice of Falkenburg

A fact from Beatrice of Falkenburg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the oldest extant donor portrait by Norwich Greyfriars (pictured) is that of the 23-year-old German queen Beatrice of Falkenburg, widow of Richard of Cornwall?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beatrice of Falkenburg.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 17, 2017 and October 17, 2023.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

"Oldest" donor portrait[edit]

Should the claim read "the oldest surviving donor portrait in stained glass"?--Wetman (talk) 17:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but on the same subject there is a current discussion at WP:ERRORS over the wording of the DYK hook. Would you be able to help? Carcharoth (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure. The source says it is the earliest extant donor portrait that remains intact. Surtsicna (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But the reliability of that source has been thrown in doubt by Surticna, in dismissing its claim that the window was in a Church in Oxford. Kevin McE (talk) 20:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]