Talk:Battle of Tippecanoe Outdoor Drama

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

3 local Indiana newspapers, a book, and The Wall Street Journal are quoted in this article. These are reputable, verifiable sources. Thanks for checking!Donalds (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Tippecanoe Outdoor Drama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more sources[edit]

While it's true that a variety of sources are cited, almost the entirety of the article comes from the 1990 souvenir program, despite cites that point to different parts of the program. This is a rather disingenous way to approach the material. Perhaps it would be useful to use the book as a source on more about the play: the writers, producers, etc. Also, it would be appropriate for earlier county planning to figure earlier in the article - some group must have conceived of the idea of an outdoor drama in order to gain approval for the funding and construction of the amphitheater. It seems rather backward in the telling to put the amphitheater after material about productions of the drama.Parkwells (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]