Talk:Battle of Tippecanoe/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
An important topic; review to follow shortly. Anaxial (talk) 11:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

The article is generally well-written and laid out properly, and seems to cover all of the important features of the battle. There are a few problems that I think need addressing, all of which should be able to fixed within one week:

• Some copyediting is needed in the first paragraph of the "Battle" section.
• The link to Prophetstown in the last paragraph of the "Battle" section points to a disambiguation page.
• The Curse of Tippecanoe is already mentioned and linked to in the text, and so does not need repeating in the "See Also" section.
• The direct quote from Harrison about Spencer's death should be more clearly sourced.
• Not a major problem, but the title "References" is generally preferred instead of "Sources", unless one is actually talking about source code or the sources of rivers, or whatever.
• The second External Link is broken.

Thank you for your review! I Believe i have addressed each of the issues. Please let me know if there is anything more. Charles Edward (Talk) 19:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

That all looks fine to me. Well done!

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: