This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
In case of a renaming, the title Battle of Kronstadt should also be considered (it may be the most common) Transerd (talk)
If the article needs renaming, start the process, but the form that was , "or, or" is really strange. The main name should follow the article name, others are added according to wiki practice. Adrian (talk) 23:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Romanian article about the battle contains several maps. Do we use these in the English version? --Norden1990 (talk) 23:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean the wikipedia version in Romanian? I don`t see any maps[1] ?Adrian (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Those maps are interesting but without any sources. I don`t know if it would be wise to use them.Adrian (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If the majority of users wants to use this maps I have nothing against since it doesn`t contain any controversial data, but if used, it must be indicated that it lacs sources.Adrian (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]