Talk:Battle Stadium D.O.N/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name[edit]

I think the name of the game is Battle Stadium D.O.N. not Battle Stadium D.O.N, yes? --Zeno McDohl (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

those two are the same... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark sonic 3 (talkcontribs)
They are not. There is a missing period in this title. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 07:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There's a missing period in the title of the game - http://battlestadium.com/index.html.
As with R.O.D, trying to "correct" D.O.N will only make it wrong. Papacha 07:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody else notice the play on the word don, as in a manga sound effect that was also used as a normal word by a character in one piece? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.74.219.175 (talk) 04:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

English version?[edit]

Do you think theres going to be an english version? http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/7188/reborn02161807ys.png —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark sonic 3 (talkcontribs)

Probably not. There was no American Jump Superstars. I hope it comes out here, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buster Sword (talkcontribs)

most likey there is gonna be an american one since one piece, DBZ, and naruto are liscenced in america. (Tirkaro 05:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

No. They are by different companies. That's why it won't come here. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 06:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

but arent DBZ, naruto, and one piece all under the control of bandai? (Tirkaro 18:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

No. Viz owns Naruto, for one. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 20:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

but I belive the naruto games are by namco-bandai. as it says the namco-bandai logo on the naruto games. not to mention the DBZ, one piece, and naruto mangas are ALL licenced by viz.(Tirkaro 17:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Well you never know....

It is very possible for this game to come out in America. Seeing as Bandai, has the rights for Naruto and One Piece, I also saw their logo on Budokai 3. Zeno, Viz. has the right to the Naruto Manga and Anime, they are not a VideoGame publisher, Bandai has that. I hope it comes here..... DaxterKing

The main problem is diffrent companies own the distribution rights for the series. Atari has the rights for Dragon Ball Z games, TOMY for Naruto, and Bandai for One Piece. If the game came out it would probably sell well because of the three popular franchises, and thus each company would want to publish it to make money. Also they might not be able to have the English anime casts voice it because Viz only owns the rights to the manga, not the anime. Takuthehedgehog 16:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When is this game gonna come out in the U.S?

why cant they do what capcom did when they did games wit other companies eg. cvs, mvs, nxc

Is it possible that it won't be released because Funimation and Viz Media don't get along, or are they rivals (much like what Nintendo and Sega once were)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.105.198 (talk) 07:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And seeing that the Wii and the PS3 have been released, that dream has Probably died even if the two companies do get along. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.105.198 (talk) 07:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the Wii does make it look like a no-no, but if a Wii sequal comes out prepare to get it here, also maybe you can buy it on your Wii. I mean all the stuff you can buy thats just in Japanese think about it. Also there all owned by ... Shonen Jump. BaconBoy914 (talk) 02:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I feel kinda bad for you guys im taking a class for Japanese. Qwarty564 talk) 07:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Game[edit]

There may be a new game, Second Life.71.191.45.73 (talk) 23:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle Stadium D.O.N. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]