Talk:Battle Angel (OVA)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Right- Lefthandedness:[edit]

There were a couple of comments about the handedness of some characters. I think these were due to the Alita manga having been mirrored in the english releases. Because the reading direction is reversed from the Japanese comics it was apparently standard procedure to just put the comics in mirror image. You can see the difference if you pick up a japanese Alita or look at the "First Order" novels which have the back-to-front reading order. The OVA actually had it correct. -Roeland

I thought it might be due to that; does adding this: "reflecting the translation of the manga from Japanese into English" onto the end of the paragraph mentioning the transpositions help out or is the mention of them even necessary? --BrokenSphere 15:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It might be best to mention it in the trivia of Battle Angel Alita since that one seems to be the odd one out, as it were. --RoelandKrop 00:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]