This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
that is a better picture, less "interesting" I must say, but a clearer picture, and a better illustration of the architecture of the bridge. Did you see this one? And are you satisfied with these edits? Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copyrighted and I will not bug him for it. - Somewhat satisfied, you're removing sentences that have value, screwed up several templates, and brought incorrect facts in.Mitch32(Want help?See here!) 01:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I should remind you, also, Mitch, that direct copying of source text that is not in quotes (even with attribution) is a copyright violation. Close paraphrasing is not illegal, but is an unethical practice. Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]