Talk:Banchory Academy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Banchory Academy is among the better public (state) schools in Scotland, and performs consistently well amongst the older years, with a large number of pupils staying on to do Highers before progressing to University." --- Care to back this up with any sort of citation? Popher 17:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/scottishschoolsonline/schools/5thyear.asp?iSchoolID=5251834 I believe that to be sufficient as a reference. Quiksilver4Eyes (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Multiple Issues Tagged[edit]

This article appears to have relatively little encyclopaedic content about the school, cites no references (WP:VERI), and has degenerated somewhat into a forum for posting negative press (WP:NPOV), and needs a good tidy up! Have removed obviously incorrect or WP:VAND material and tagged for cleanup. Seajay (talk) 10:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given the large sections of content in this article under Banchory in the news and The Coffee Bar that are really WP:SOAP or at the very least WP:OR or WP:NPOV, I would propose removing these sections. They are not really helpful in describing Banchory Academy itself - they are simply describing some recent events that took place there. This article really should have more information about the Academy itself, have a look at Scotch College, Perth, a recent featured article on the schools portal as an example of good practice for school encyclopedia articles.
As stated in WP:NOT, "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; merely being true or useful does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia.". If no-one else tidies this up in the next few weeks I will remove a lot of this stuff. Seajay (talk) 07:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No further information or citations, and no-one has attempted tidy up, so am taking the step of sorting this and removing all non-encyclopedic content, to try to bring it more in line as a basic stub article. Still needs expanding with relevant content of course! Seajay (talk) 12:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]