Talk:Avro Canada CF-103/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Fix the small problem with "coupled" noted by the awkward tag. Might do well to break up that long sentence.
Fixed. Bzuk (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Would do well to describe the structure in more detail. Is it pretty much the same as the CF-100?
Added detail explaining the airframe fuselage structure was essentially the same but wing and tail surfaces had major alterations.Bzuk (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. B. Focused:
  2. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  5. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Failed, no response from editor.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the changes were made but didn't know a response was necessary. Bzuk (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]