Talk:Assumption-based planning

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Advocates rather than informs[edit]

This article is written in a manner that advocates the use of the article subject rather than providing objective information.

Statements such as "It is for that reason that ABP should be strongly interwoven into the whole business planning process" should not be in an encyclopedia article.

Also, the article is written in the 2nd person, as if it were an instructional passage. Again, this is not conventional for encyclopedia articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.177.186.19 (talk) 18:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Critical assumption planning appears to have little or no notability by itself. The Sykes and Dunham paper has only been cited 13 times in 14 years, and it gets a mere handful number of Google hits. Fences&Windows 21:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]