Talk:Association football during World War I

Football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Frederick Wall / "Traitor"[edit]

Thought I'd be polite and leave a note about this here.

The Guardian article reads:

[Hogan] was almost destitute but when he went to London the secretary, Frederick Wall, opened a cupboard and offered him a pair of khaki socks:
"We sent these to the boys at the front and they were grateful." The unsubtle message was: "Traitor."

I'm not sure the journalist's interpretation is strong enough to say that Wall "called" Hogan a "traitor", as the article here does. I'm going to change it to "implied", for now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whamilton42 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Association football during World War I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090417080654/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWfootball.htm to http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWfootball.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swiss footballers 'signed up to fight'?[edit]

I query the accuracy of the impressive statement 5,800 players in the Swiss national Football League literally 'signed up to fight'. Switzerland was neutral throughout the war with its government deciding not to side with either alliance. The only opportunities for Swiss to be in combat were as volunteers in other countries' forces such as French Foreign Legion. It may probably be more correct to say they signed up to enlist as their militia based system was geared to defence but did not have any invaders to fight off in the event.Cloptonson (talk) 09:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]