Talk:Ashlee Simpson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleAshlee Simpson was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 2, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
September 12, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 13, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 1, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Future Events[edit]

Her next tour is planned for the fall of 2005, and she is scheduled to appear on The Oprah Winfrey Show in October, both to sing and to discuss the SNL incident. Simpson has said that she would like to return to SNL, although nothing has been confirmed as of September 2005. Her second album, I Am Me, featuring the single "Boyfriend", is scheduled for release on October 18, 2005. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by RN (talkcontribs) 20:17, 13 September 2005

Featured Music Project evaluation[edit]

Ashlee Simpson has been evaluated according to the Featured Music Project criteria, most recently affirmed as of this revision. The article's most important issues are listed below. Since this evaluation, the article may have been improved.

The following areas need work to meet the criteria: Lead - Pictures - Audio
The space below is for limited discussion on this article's prospects as a featured article candidate. Please take conversations to the article talk page.
  • Lead: Needs to be a longer and more comprehensive summary
  • Pictures: Needs fair use rationales
  • Audio: None
  • Needs print sources, musical style, influences and legacy, but that may be impossible due to the recentness of her career; still, more substantial sources would be good
  • Discography presumably complete, but seems to be giving a lot of information that may be better in a subpage
  • Format and style good, but the external links ought to be trimmed, or it ought to be made more clear why those are useful —Preceding unsigned comment added by TUF-KAT (talkcontribs) 03:59, 28 February 2006