Talk:Arthur Neslen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned article?[edit]

According to the criteria, "An article is orphaned if fewer than three other articles link to it. However, this is a strict definition of the term and there is still discussion regarding whether to have a more relaxed definition in order to clear the backlog of orphans. Currently our priority is to focus on orphans with NO incoming links at all, and it is recommended to only place the {{orphan}} tag if the article has ZERO incoming links from other articles. One or two incoming links may be sufficient as long as they are relevant. " (emphasis in original). This article has incoming links from four others, and is clearly not an orphan. Please stop edit-warring to add this inappropriate tag. RolandR (talk) 22:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but User:TedderBot/NewPageSearch/URBLP/archive does not count. That leaves three, which I guess is the bare minimum. ArcAngel (talk) ) 22:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:1950–1951 Baghdad bombings doesn't count either. ArcAngel (talk) ) 22:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"It is recommended to only place the {{orphan}} tag if the article has ZERO incoming links from other articles". RolandR (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arthur Neslen. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/735648.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Several issues with this page: tone, neutrality, sources.[edit]

The previous edit (April 2019) vastly increased article length, but it refers almost exclusively to Arthur Neslen's own Guardian articles and appears to be mostly self-promotional and autobiographical. Phrases such as "his revelations led to policy changes" seem slightly exagerating the impact of the author on the policy-making machine. Phrases such as "Although his position was scrapped due to cost-cuts" and "he exposed" and "he revealed" and "uncovered" are too strong and make it almost seem as if the article was written by Mr Neslen himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Il.principe (talk • contribs) 11:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]