Talk:Armet Davis Newlove Architects

A fact from Armet Davis Newlove Architects appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 252 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Armet & Davis was an architectural firm in California that designed buildings in the so-called Googie architecture style popular during the 1950s?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/February.

Wikipedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armet Davis Newlove Architects article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

More Pictures[edit]

One more picture please... or two.
Maybe a coffeehouse?
Warrington (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I'm not sure if it's accepted to have whole sentences fullquoted in the running text of the article.
Certainly it's a poor source when you're quoting someone who is quoting someone who vents his opinion...
Of the 19 sources quoted, 14 are taken from the LA Times. Not sure if this might be a problem.

--BjKa (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]