Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Not really something that should go in the wikipedia but![edit]

This film is terrible, The acting is poor, The plot is poor, The effects are poor its just rubbish.

Yeah, it's like a really bad copy of Saw... 201.205.238.34 (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Rafa[reply]

How good the movie is has nothing to do with whether or not the movie should be included in "the" wikipedia. What is relevant, however, is that the article badly needs a rewrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Gazel Ministry (talk • contribs) 19:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the author of the original comment was suggesting his comment shouldn't really go in "the wikipedia" article because it is OR, not that the article shouldn't exist on wikipedia.--86.8.252.7 (talk) 09:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tetris?[edit]

I thought the killer was the Shadow Man? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.38.3 (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

1) A cursory internet search returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources, with #1 and #2 in the search being IMDB and the films own website. Rotten Tomatoes does not show any print or electronic reviews of a professional nature.

2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM

3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.

4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.

5) The film is not historically notable.

6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals.

7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.

10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.

11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema.

12) No notable actors or directors

I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 17:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

remake[edit]

Is this a remake of Kolobos? Seems similar. --24.94.251.190 (talk) 06:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]