Talk:Arduinome

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sorry but the "The plans for the Arduinome are released under an open source, non-commercial use only license" isn't a license, is a statement, you can not call a licence open source without been approved by the OSI. The link provided just says the same thing, without specifiyng a specific license. It's not CC, nor BSD, just a statement. Also, I doubt that a non-commercial license could be called "open source". Also "As well as the Arduino board, many Arduinomes [...]" ... what? As well as the Arduino board? If I remember the Arduino board doesn't use button pads or pcb's from Sparkfun (some Arduinos might be builded by Sparkfun, like the Pro, but that's different). HavokCR (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Even worse, although they state "open source, non-commercial use only" the license at http://sourceforge.net/projects/arduinome/ is GPL v2.0 - which specifically allows commercial use (it is Open Source, as well as Free). As a result, they have two contradictory licenses (non-commercial use only, and Free), which raises questions about the licensing status overall. 76.111.29.107 (talk) 19:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple licences don't contradict, they complement. If both licences are offered, then the user can choose either one to follow. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arduinome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]