Talk:Arche

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Ancient Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Ancient philosophy

Untitled[edit]

Suggest giving full citation for 'DK' used in text and notes.DIELS-KRANZ 173.73.29.158 (talk) 22:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation[edit]

Arche is pronounced more correctly as in IPA /arxei/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.52.229.251 (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible typo[edit]

Shouldn't 'undemonstrable' be spelled 'indemonstrable' which is the more common spelling? --Rmanke (talk) 17:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is very poor[edit]

It is a mess. Non sensical sentences like: “This is considered as a permanent substance or nature either one or more which is conserved in the generation of rest of it.”

And “This source of entity is always preserved” are strewn around like they have been copy pasted from another language and then poorly translated into English. In addition there is no overarching structure.

The article needs a complete overhaul and correct English. 85.148.213.144 (talk) 02:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]