Talk:AnyJunk

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

AnyJunk shares a similar business story to 1-800-GOT-JUNK?. I will edit the page now to ensure that it is informative for Wikipedia users. Tim Witcomb (talk) 15:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}Tim Witcomb (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

It wasn't clear what your question was? If you have further questions, add the {{helpme}} tag to your talk page, and don't forget to specify what it is you need help with! TFOWR 15:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have made changes to the page - please remove the speedy deletion tag? Tim Witcomb (talk) 07:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you have a conflict of interest on this and the Jason Mohr article, it would be best if you recused yourself from the discussion. Editors are strongly discouraged from creating articles on people and organisations with which they have an association. Harry the Dog WOOF 08:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picking up on Harry the Dog's comment: WP:COI is a good place to start. I would strongly recommend that instead of editing the article you post here, on the talkpage, instead - and let editors without a conflict of interest edit the article.

However, my concern is more with the notability of the company. Providing references that demonstrate that the company is notable - and that the article is not simply an attempt to promote the company - will be the best way to address the concerns that the {{db-g11}} tag highlights.

TFOWR 09:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AnyJunk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101227085538/http://www.growingbusiness.co.uk/any-junk.html to http://www.growingbusiness.co.uk/any-junk.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.emapawards.com/emap/frontend/reg/tOtherPage.csp?pageID=63156&eventID=49
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://customerkings.realbusiness.co.uk/assets/CKings09_supplement.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AnyJunk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100806112840/http://realbusiness.co.uk/sales_and_marketing/anyjunk_founder_jedward_are_rubbish to http://realbusiness.co.uk/sales_and_marketing/anyjunk_founder_jedward_are_rubbish

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]