Talk:Andrew Pettigrew

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

No problem, if verifiable, third-party sources can be cited and Andrew Pettigrew's notability passed the requirements of WP:BIO, maybe the article won't be deleted. Useight 06:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At a glance, this appears to be unsuitable for a speedy IMHO. His name also returns a fair amount of google hits, though I didn't sort through all of them to see how many were the same guy. --Bongwarrior 06:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gentlemen. I shall continue and improve the entry. He is considered a very important scholar at the level of Michael Porter, for instance, although less well known in the USA. I shall also make the additions to pages on strategy, for instance, that expand wiki coverage on the area of strategic management research --Boatearth 10:55 21 May 2007 (GMT)

Both wikify and jargon tags are very vague! What exactly is someone suggesting? There is no more jargon here than necessary, IMHO Boatearth 11:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew Pettigrew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]