This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
A fact from Amur-class minelayer (1898) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Shouldn't the article deal with all six Amurs ? The second-run ships was practically identical to their 1898 prototypes. East of Borschov 10:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's true, but it seems a little odd to consider them as one class when the second batch weren't laid down until after the first ones had been sunk. Feel free to add more material to this from the Russian-language book.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]