Talk:Alt-Schauenburg Castle

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mix up?[edit]

This article is a strange mixture of information about two different castles, one in Switzerland and another in Germany about 100 miles North. The photos and navbox appear to relate to the Swiss castle, I have photos but little information on the German castle. The infobox photo is the German castle, the other photo is of the Swiss castle. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 23:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nimbus227: This article is about the one in Switzerland. Could you tell me (or remove them yourself) the ones of the German castle? I got the pictures from the Dutch Wikipedia so maybe that's why. Ana r chyte 04:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox photo (File:Oberkirch Schauenburg.jpg) is definitely of the Oberkirch (Baden) castle, the other photo appears to be of the Swiss castle. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The "History" and "Modern day" sections, and their sources, are clearly about the castle at Oberkirch, Germany, with its restaurant with web site. Quite a mess. PamD 11:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wondered about just deleting the stuff about the wrong castle, but it might be better to copy it into a new article about Schauenburg Castle (Oberkirch) or similar, with all the apropriate templates recording the history of the articles - see WP:PROSPLIT. PamD 12:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That means all my hard work on this article a few months back wasn't as useful as I originally thought...

Ana r chyte 12:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nimbus227 and PamD: A year later, I have created Schauenburg Castle (Oberkirch). I hope this clears up any further confusion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, good stuff. Cheers Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 17:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good - I've tweaked the dab page and added a hatnote to the Swiss castle. Thanks. PamD 18:08, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alt-Schauenburg Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150409071940/http://triptern.com/guide/basel-schauenburg-castle-switzerland to http://triptern.com/guide/basel-schauenburg-castle-switzerland

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]