Talk:Aldreth

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aldreth copyvio[edit]

Large sections of the article were removed due to being WP:COPYVIO taken from Reference.com:Aldreth. The previous version of the article can be seen here. Following removal, the article was demoted to stub class. Some external references were added to help future editors rebuild the article. --Senra (talk) 20:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above was a mistake. When Reference.com:Aldreth was examined against this version of the Aldreth article, it looked as if the article was a copy from reference.com. It now appears that it is the other way around. So the article has been restored. The two sources The principal mediaeval text of the Hereward story: battle 1 and The principal mediaeval text of the Hereward story: battle 2 have been checked. The article paraphases the sources; it still needs a re-write to a more appropriate tone for the encyclopaedia.

Aldreth fort[edit]

High danger of WP:OR here, so keeping it on the talk page. Reading the articles accounts of Herewards exploits (which, although colourful, I believe are correctly paraphrased from Gesta Herwardi) I began to wonder what archaeological records exist in the area. Looking at the OS map centred at TL423702GB we see Belsar's Hill which, coincidentally(?) has a National Monuments record. Could this be the site of the Aldreth fort? A search of archaeological records within 2km² centred on Aldreth and then centred on Willingham, Cambridgeshire reveals more archaeological finds in the Willingham area (of course that just might mean there has been more digging there). Anyway, food for thought at least --Senra (talk) 23:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aldreth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322142952/http://www.elypeople.co.uk/news/Haddenham-Aldreth-Celebrate-Blossoms-amp-Bygones/story-11107837-detail/story.html to http://www.elypeople.co.uk/news/Haddenham-Aldreth-Celebrate-Blossoms-amp-Bygones/story-11107837-detail/story.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://boar.org.uk/ariwxo3FNQsupXXI.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://boar.org.uk/ariwxo3FNQsupXXV.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aldreth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110513013852/http://www.elypeople.co.uk/pictures/Blossoms-Bygones-Goes-1940s-8211-2011/pictures-11107699-detail/pictures.html to http://www.elypeople.co.uk/pictures/Blossoms-Bygones-Goes-1940s-8211-2011/pictures-11107699-detail/pictures.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]