Talk:Aita (disambiguation)

On 10 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Aita. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 10 October 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 22:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aita (disambiguation) → Aita
Aita → Aita (mythology)

– The title has different meanings, probably the deity is not the primary one. See also Special:WhatLinksHere/Aita MrKeefeJohn (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Of the entries on the disambiguation page, there are only two that are called Aita, rather than AITA or a partial disambiguation where Aita is a first or last name. Of those, one of those is an article about a river that is four sentences long that looks like a database entry simply documenting it exists, and the other is an article about a regional musical style that is three sentences long and contains no references. The Etruscan deity probably does have long-term significance over those two, and it receives most of the pageviews as well. Egsan Bacon (talk) 03:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the entries are not two, but three. I mean Aita, Aita (river) and Aita (Morocco). And there should be also Aita (given name) and Aita (surname) MrKeefeJohn (talk) 21:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I add [1] and it seems that Aita it's the most relevant topic.MrKeefeJohn (talk) 21:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Names are not to be discounted, and the qualities of the other articles are inappropriate measures of the topics' significance. A Google Scholar search shows no clear primary topic. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, and per Hameltion. BD2412 T 00:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose The deity is indeed primary, as all other uses fall under WP:DIFFCAPS or WP:PTM, or have massively fewer views. Names are naturally partial title matches unless the person in question is commonly referred to only as that name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Religion has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Disambiguation has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, A google search brings up the subreddit first, then the Etruscan god. Also, I feel like the shortness argument is not valid; the god, while not a stub, only has 6,000 bytes of info (of which I am assuming the majority are in the citations and bibliography). ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 15:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: the god appears to be the primary topic for the mixed-case version, while the Reddit is primary for AITA. PamD 17:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per Egsan Bacon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the pageviews, and the deity likely having greater long-term significance. I don't think the Reddit topic poses a problem, as it seems always to be referred to in all caps, and so is covered by WP:DIFFCAPS. – Michael Aurel (talk) 04:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination, Hameltion, BD2412 and Mitch199811. There are eleven entries listed upon the Aita (disambiguation) page and the six-sentence stub delineating the Etruscan deity Aita does not confirm historical renown of such overwhelming extent as to dwarf the combined notability of the ten remaining entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.