Talk:Abul Hasan Ali Hasani Nadwi/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled
I'm not sure that the sidebar on the Deobandi movement is needed. The Nadwi scholars of the Nadwatul Ulama movement are generally not considered Deobandi. 69.113.7.9 (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
I agree with the above statement. Nadvi and Deobandi definitely have different approaches. Shaad's space talk 17:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
NADWA IS ALSO CONSIDERED AS SISTER CONCERN OF DEOBAND..THERE IS NO DIFFERENT IN IDEOLOGY AND NADVI ARE ALSO CLAIMED AS DEOBANDI IN TERMS OF IDEOLOGY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.1.80.100 (talk) 17:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Books
I've removed the very long list of books. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor is it a database. If the information is to be added back, only selected notable works should be included or they should be included on a separate page. (I said in the edit summary that I was moving the list to the talk page but decided against it due to the size. It is retrievable in the edit history) Opencooper (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)