Talk:A Man Called Horse (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Westerns: Film Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Film task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Man called horse.jpg[edit]

Image:Man called horse.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Section "Representation of cultures"[edit]

The section now consists of a first paragraph, added by FT2 on 2 July 2007, that seems to imply the film is historically accurate, and a second paragraph, added by Joefernandez on 4 February 2008, which seems to be saying the exact opposite.

The second paragraph is editorializing and unreferenced. It is not stated whether the Jacquelyn Kilpatrick quotation is from her book Celluloid Indians or from another book or article by her. (At any rate, the rather cautious phrasing in the quotation that the film "must be discussed in terms of reality and authenticity" hardly proves Kilpatrick to be a "heavy" critic of it.)

In spite of its shortcomings, I was reluctant to just remove the second paragraph because it seems to contain a valid point that might be "saved" by adding a more precise reference and removing the editorializing. I added the {{contradiction}} tag in the hope that somebody will be able to check some sources, work the section over and make a nice, balanced synthesis :D --Bwiki (talk) 23:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My issues with the descriptor of this film as being part english and " part souix " are several. First there is no " souix language ". And second is that although there are several lakota words badly pronounced in the film, they are interspersed amongst absolute gibberish. There are 3 main souixan languages - dakota, lakota, and nakota, and it seems that the few lakota words that were brutalized by the actors do exist, they don't even come close to the meanings ascribed to them in the subtitles. Facialfirearms (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

batise not baptiste[edit]

per the film credits as well as imdb — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.186.86.53 (talk) 02:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article[edit]

Basic information to add to this article: is this film based on a true story, or entirely fictional? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Psuedo Cultural representation[edit]

All of the ideas behind the psuedospiritual scenes are non existant within the culture being represented. A scene in which Richard Harris is seen in a sweatlodge ostensibly performing an Inipi ceremony literally has no bearing whatsoever on the actual use of the Inipi, or the Hanblecheya or " vision quest " ( also a misnomer ) which it implies is happening. Every single spiritual scene is an utter fabrication no different from the terrible representations of native people in the westerns of the 1950s and 60s. This film in no way represents any actual Lakota spirituality, but does represent the post hippie idea of embracing the idea of native spirituality even though the people involved never actually learned any of those ideas from any actually practising native people, with false ideas being promulgated. Facialfirearms (talk) 05:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]