Talk:A Christmas Story (1972 TV special)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move discussion in progress[edit]

Resolved

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 May 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move. Consensus is that the proposed name is incomplete disambiguation and the year is needed. It's a fair point that the theatrical film A Christmas Story is not a TV special, but as noted, there is also the TV show A Christmas Story Live!. Cúchullain t/c 13:55, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



A Christmas Story (1972 TV special)A Christmas Story (TV special) – Followup to reverted bold page move. Article is currently unnecessarily disambiguated by year – this is the only article (or redirect) that is disambiguated by "TV special" so "by year disambiguation" is unnecessary. The only other candidate is A Christmas Story which as the lede makes clear is a television film (and which, indeed, is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this title, and needs no further disambiguation in any case). Leaving a redirect at A Christmas Story (1972 TV special) should be sufficient. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I definitely would oppose moving A Christmas Story to A Christmas Story (1972 film) – it's not a film (and IMDb is irrelevant to this, as per WP:RS/IMDb), but a 30-minute TV program/special. --IJBall (contribstalk) 00:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not citing IMDB as a source, I'm showing how another major information resource classifies this topic to demonstrate that we probably have it wrong. Beyond the film, and the live musical version, we could probably also find that several TV episodes named "(The/A) Christmas Story" were called "specials" in their day. -- Netoholic @ 00:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. That pretty much negates any opposition to this RM proposal then, as there is no way that the primary should be referred to as a "TV special". IOW, there is only one "TV special" – the 1972 version. --IJBall (contribstalk) 12:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's just not true. Theatrical films can also be called television specials if marketed or generally thought of as such.[1] Last year's live musical version certainly was marketed as such. --Netoholic @ 18:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. TV special and TV film are very ambiguous terms to use as disambiguators. Better to keep the year. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A Christmas Story '70 is not a television film, it's bizarre it's being characterized as one (because it's been played on TV?) Ribbet32 (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, under this thinking, both The Wizard of Oz and The Ten Commandments are "television specials", because they were run as "holiday television specials" for years – it makes no sense. --IJBall (contribstalk) 12:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.