Talk:ALCOR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ALCOR. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ALCOR multiplication sign has nothing to do with runic (or Maltese or other) cross[edit]

The article reads:

4. An early "standard" character set for representing ALGOL 60 code on paper and paper tape. This character set included the unusual "᛭" runic cross[1] character for multiplication and the "⏨" Decimal Exponent Symbol[2] for floating point notation.

This is not correct concerning the multiplication sign. The Algol 60 Revised Report uses a multiplication sign (×) that is distinct from the asterisk (*), the latter not being a delimiter of Algol 60. The CCITT-2 code used for paper tapes does not contain either of the two. So ALCOR had to define a code point and chose 110·01¹, thus replacing the question mark (?). None of these characters has anything to do with a runic cross (᛭).

The code point 010·01¹, by the CCITT-2 standard the ENQ control character also named WRU (who are you), was explicitly forbidden in the ALCOR character set. At that time, it was sometimes graphically represented as a Cross pattée (✠) which my have led to the remark about the runic cross which has some similarity. But this was never used as a multiplication sign.

¹) these code points in their figure interpretation
--Lantani (talk) 11:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]