Talk:2019 College Football Playoff National Championship/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 20:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

@PCN02WPS: Hi! I will take a look at this by the end of this week. -Riley1012 (talk) 02:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

• ...aside from any all star games that followed... "all-star" instead of "all star"
• The top-ranked Alabama Crimson Tide faced the fourth-ranked Oklahoma Sooners in the Orange Bowl and the second-ranked Clemson Tigers... Comma needed after "Orange Bowl"
• Alabama marched downfield on their next drive, covering 75 yards in ten plays, to score a touchdown with opportunity to tie the game... Add "an" before "opportunity"
• Clemson then capitalized with a five-yard pass from Lawrence to Etienne to make push the lead to 12 points, 28–16. I think "make push" is a typo
• However, three plays later the scoring was opened by Clemson cornerback A. J. Terrell... Add a comma after "later"
• ...the successful extra point pushing their lead to 44–16. Change "pushing" to "pushed"
• Clemson was then unable to take advantage of their possession, and punted for the first time since the first quarter... The comma after "possession" is not needed
• ...Clemson's offensive starters were removed from the game and Chase Brice was put in at quarterback. Add a comma after "game"
  • All done as recommended. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

2. Verifiable
Copyvio check passed.

• There are some inconsistencies with the |website and |publisher parameters throughout the article- if they are the same (ex: ref 2 where the website is www.espn.com and the publisher is ESPN), they don't need to be repeated. Also, there needs to be consistency (ex: ref 2 has the website as www.espn.com while ref 12 has Espn.com and then ref 27 just has ESPN).
  • Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
• Dead links that need to be archived: 7
  • Done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
• Spot check

  The most recent prior matchup of undefeated teams in a championship game had been the 2011 BCS National Championship Game, which saw 13–0 Auburn defeat 12–0 Oregon Ref. 16 does not mention that this was the most recent matchup of undefeated teams.

  This is the same issue with ref. 17, which doesn't show FSU was the most recent undefeated champion.

  • Went ahead and removed both of these; if I find a source that has these I can add them back later. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Okay, if you can find a list of the previous national championship games with record that could work. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

• Fans in attendance at Levi's Stadium saw the Clemson University Tiger Band and Alabama's Million Dollar Band perform. Is there a reference for this that is not WP:RSSELF?

  • Don't know that this is super relevant so I went ahead and removed it. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

  No issues: 9, 10, 19, 23, 32

3. Broad
The article is broad and stays focused on its coverage of the game.

4. Neutral
The article is not biased in its coverage of the game

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day, no edit warring.

6. Illustrated
The images in the article are free and have relevant captions- great pictures from Legoktm.

@PCN02WPS: A few issues, but I am happy to pass once these are fixed. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

@Riley1012 Thanks for the review! All points above have been done. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@PCN02WPS: Looks good now, thanks! -Riley1012 (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.