Talk:2015 Sri Lankan parliamentary election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Sri Lanka High‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 17 August 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No move - did not reach consensus required to make move -- Callinus (talk) 15:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:COMMONTERM. WP:OFFICIAL name is 'Parliamentary general election, 2015'. When shortening, it is the word 'parliamentary' gets dropped more commonly. Google results are heavily in favour of the term 'general election'. News-outlets also follows the precedent. eg. http://www.srilankanelections.com/ Chanaka L (talk) 11:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sri Lanka also has public presidential elections, and the Wikipedia convention is that in countries with both types of popular elections (presidential and parliamentary), the term general election is generally reserved for elections in which both the president and parliament are elected together (eg Mozambican general election, 2014). The current title is preferable as it is more WP:PRECISE. Number 5 7 14:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - As Number 57 has stated, Sri Lanka is an executive presidency and naming legislative elections as "general elections" will confuse editors not familiar with the Sri Lankan elections.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 07:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It could be use as redirect. --Antan O 07:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above; pretty clear-cut case. AntanO Redirect to what? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 20:10, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New name "Sri Lankan general election, 2015" to existing name "Sri Lankan parliamentary election, 2015" --Antan O 04:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clear cut case of Wikipedians' blatant adherence to the policies and guidelines while completely go against common sense. We, wikipedians think we being cute, even when the government information website name it, general election. Sorry to see wikipedians reasoning triumph dogmatic adherence over case-specific intellectual rigor.--Chanaka L (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, the world is full of people without any common sense. The Department of Elections, Al jAzeera, BBC, CBC, CNN, The Guardian, The Hindu, Time and the UN all call it parliamentary election. What idiots. If only the world (and Wikipedia) were ruled by Chanakal.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 11:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are cherry picking, the same elections department refers it parliament general election as I pointed out in the nom. All your news sources are foreign. Care to cite local sources like Adaderana, daily mirror--Chanaka L (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a global project and so it needs to reflect what WP:RS around the world are saying. Nevertheless, here are some "local" RS to chew on - Sunday Times, Daily FT, The Nation and The Island.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 10:34, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - As per official name of Department of Elections and rude comment. --Antan O 11:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry mate. I don't have anything against you.--Chanaka L (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Changing one would mean changing all the past election articles, not just 2004 and 2010. I agree with AntanO, a redirect can be used till there is a better consensus on the issue.--Blackknight12 (talk) 02:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.