Talk:2011 Port Adelaide Football Club season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Format of results[edit]

Should it have Port's score listed first, with the winning score in bold and a seperate column for "Home/Away", the home team first and Port's score bolded, or a completely different format, like seen here? SellymeTalk 22:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What about the home team on the left, away team on the right, and the winning team's result in bold? JaumeBG 09:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So the third option then? I've started working on it here. SellymeTalk 09:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, after carefully checking every available source, it appears that for now it's best with my first proposed method, but I'll work on this to replace it. SellymeTalk 10:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, just spent an entire Uni Studies lesson editing my Dump page, and finally got it all done and updated! No more issues with the table formatting now. If anyone has any other ideas for improving this article and can't be bothered to do it themselves, just tell me. SellymeTalk 23:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Best?[edit]

What exactly does it mean? In the results section? Is it best players for the team or something different? Protenpinner (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's the official list of best players on ground for that day as provided by the AFL. It's generally used as a re-cap of Brownlow Medal chances later in the season. SellymeTalk 07:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 Port Adelaide Football Club season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2011 Port Adelaide Football Club season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]