Talk:1997 in music

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Da_Funk#Charts_and_certifications|See chart performance entry]] The anchor (#Charts_and_certifications) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[One_Headlight#Charts_and_certifications|See chart performance entry]] The anchor (#Charts_and_certifications) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Beetlebum#Charts_and_certifications|See chart performance entry]] The anchor (#Charts_and_certifications) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled 2009 comment[edit]

Care for a mention of Candle In the Wind 1997? The biggest selling single of all time. Robbie williams released some big hits as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.224.235 (talk) 22:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please enter the albums in alphabetical order, otherwise it will be impossible to search. Thanks!!

Classical music section[edit]

I've undone an edit by Deb in which the line of text at the beginning of the section was deleted for the reason that it was "superfluous". Removing superfluous text is to be welcomed but I don't think this is superfluous. Without an explanation as to what the entries in the section refer to, there could be confusion – was this composition completed or begun in 1997? Or premiered? Or first recorded? Alchemagenta (talk) 18:53, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you're right, and I should have explained. I deleted the introduction because it just said "The following works were composed..." or something like that, which is stating the obvious. We don't have an introductory line on any of the other sections. There is no more reason to have it on classical music than on any other section; it could be said of any musical work that it might have been written at a different time from when it was first performed. The "Year in music" pages are already very long and need the minimum of additional verbiage. Deb (talk) 12:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not having explanatory sentences in other sections isn't necessarily a strong argument for deleting explanatory text in one section; I think we should be seeking clarity of information over and above homogeneity of layout. Classical music is, arguably, a special case. The sentence you deleted actually said: "The following classical music compositions were completed in 1997." The distinction this is making derives from the fact that, unlike popular music, classical music composition can take years of work to complete and that it may not be publicly premiered or recorded until some time later. Therefore, as I stated above, I think it's important to identify what the entry in this article actually represents: completion of composition, premiere performance or first recording, all of which are significant events in the classical music world. In terms of music history, I believe the year that the composition was completed is the most salient fact. I agree that the 'Years in music' articles are generally long and this fact has been raised occasionally on some of the articles' talk pages. I think, rather than excising explanatory text, if you consider the article too long it would be better to consider splitting ~~the~~ it as was done recently with 2008 in music where the 'Albums released' section was separated out to create the new article List of albums released in 2008. Alchemagenta (talk) 11:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with you on the above. If you go to the page for a classical music composition, you'll normally find that the date attributed to it is the date it was first performed in public - just as, with a book, the date given is normally the date of publication, not the date it was written. This is comparable to popular music, where the release date for a recording is normally very close to the date of first public performance. However, I would agree that, where there is a great difference in time between the two, a note should be made, eg. Symphony no 1 (1882) (written in 1860-65). (That's an imaginary example, BTW.) Deb (talk) 13:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Top Hits" section.[edit]

The "Top Hits" section doesn't seem to be needed in this article. We already have the "Biggest Hit Singles" section, which is better sourced, gives the same information as "top hits", and gives this information on a larger scale (global record sales as opposed to a subjective list of popular songs primarily from the U.S. and England). "Top Hits" is made redundant with the aforementioned "Biggest Hit Singles" section. Therefore, I propose that the "Top Hits" section should be deleted from the article. --Daniel913 (talk) 00:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soda Stereo[edit]

I'm sorry, but it seems like you're forgetting someone. Soda Stereo, a rock band from Argentina, and one of the greatest latin rock bands ever. They separated on September 20, 1997, after their legendary last concert, which was recorded as "El Ultimo Concierto" (The Last Concert). You should probably put that on the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.222.74.78 (talk) 05:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC) yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.235.232.241 (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]