Talk:1987 World Championships in Athletics – Men's high jump
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Medals?[edit]
How trustworthy is the used source? This source clearly defines Avdeyenko as bronze medalist, based upon the fact that he only cleared 2.35 upon his third attempt, while Paklin did so on his second attempt.--Paracel63 (talk) 11:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- That is according to the general tie-breaking rules outlined in the article High jump. Was there another set of tie-breaking rules at hand in Rome in 1987? In that case I think this should be sourced.--Paracel63 (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1987 World Championships in Athletics – Men's high jump. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108063745/http://www.todor66.com/athletics/world/1987/Men_High_Jump.html to http://todor66.com/athletics/world/1987/Men_High_Jump.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)