Talk:1987 Pacific hurricane season/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to fail this GAN. Too many sections are far too short, Greg's section is unsourced, I see some blatant false information in some of the sections, and there are several usages of knots (the project prefers no usage of knots and instead both mph and km/h; the article uses neither). Try finding more Mexican impact, too. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, not that it's a huge deal, but it appears the article isn't unstable. I see there have been 30 edits in the past 24 hours. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the review ill try next week (I was in the middle of fixing it, I dont know why I nominated it so early.) Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 20:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I belived I fixed this issue. Hink, this year has a sereve lack of info (no TCR's) as indicated one the article's talk page. Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 20:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are still numerous instances of knots used, several sections use "kmh" (it's km/h), some of the sections are blatantly false still (there are mentions of storms moving east-northeastward when that is clearly not the case), and I did a quick check and there was more impact on Jova, Lidia, Max, Peke, and Ramon. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While we're at it, there are several instances of unclear wording I discovered early on in the article. There is a MWR article for the 1987 season. I'd suggest getting a copy of it to help explain why some of the systems strengthened or weakened. The text is a bit thin. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to get the MWR for free? Aslo, this what i get form norma Am I doing this right? Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 22:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]