Talk:1959–60 Burnley F.C. season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article1959–60 Burnley F.C. season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 22, 2023.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 4, 2021Good article nomineeListed
May 6, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:1959–60 Burnley F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 11:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello WA8MTWAYC, I'll be taking up the review for this article which I will present shortly. Hopefully, my feedback will be helpful and I will get to learn something interesting in the process. Tayi Arajakate Talk 11:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    WA8MTWAYC, I am impressed. This is a very well research and well written article. It already meets the good article criteria so I'm going to promote. I have still left some comments below regarding a couple minor issues. Tayi Arajakate Talk 12:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Tayi Arajakate Thank you very much for your time and review, it's really appreciated! I've addressed your comments. Cheers, WA8MTWAYC (talk) 14:47, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • I couldn't access the two books but seeing as there are no issues with original research with respect to the rest of the references, I am going to assume they have been accurately represented in the article.
  • Not sure if "protagonists" is an appropiate term to use. I would suggest using "contenders" instead.
  • "... before beating Nottingham Forest—last season's FA Cup winners—8–0 at Turf Moor." This reads awkwardly, I would suggest rearranging it into someting like " ... before beating last season's ..."
  • I would recommend removing the refs beside the "Results" subheadings and incorporating them in their respective charts in the manner you have done with "Partial league table". I know they aren't technically subheadings but bolded text but they act like subheadings.

Assessment[edit]

  1. Comprehension: The article is very well written.
  2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is good. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is complaint with the manual of style. Pass Pass
  3. Verifiability: The article meets standards for verifiability.
  4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) The article is cited with in-line citations. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Sources used are reliable. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research was found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright violations found. Pass Pass
  5. Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
  6. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article has a comprehensive coverage. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article does not deviate from its subject. Pass Pass
  7. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
  8. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    Complaint with the policy on neutral point of view. Pass Pass
  9. Stability: The article is stable.
  10. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No content dispute, edit warring or major changes. Pass Pass
  11. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
  12. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Images are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Caption and use are good. Pass Pass