Talk:1958 BOAC Bristol Britannia crash

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.daveg4otu.tripod.com/hancrash.html
- In 1958 Bristol Britannia 312 crash on 2011-05-25 03:37:04, 404 Not Found
- In 1958 Bristol Britannia 312 crash on 2011-06-04 18:28:27, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pilot error[edit]

"The Britannia aircraft was fitted with a 3-handed altimeter which required a higher degree of concentration to read correctly than was desirable. The crew misread the instrument believing that they were at 11,500 feet when they began descending, when in fact they were only at 1,500 feet" - sounds like design fault, so how is this "pilot error"? No references, so unable to check what the source says. Socrates2008 (Talk) 09:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its claimed that the crew just misread them, I have added an aftermath section describing the withdrawl of these altimeters in British aircraft after the accident. MilborneOne (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, shouldn't, "... they were at a much higher altitude and that they were reading the instruments correctly." be revised to, "...they were at a much higher altitude and that they were reading the instruments incorrectly."? ☺ Dick Kimball (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]