Talk:Étienne Hastrel de Rivedoux/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    French placenames should be rendered in French, not translated. (Île de Ré, not Isle of Rhé) Watch your accents; I already added one to Grand Armée. Why is France italicized? Command, not manage.
    should be good now.
    Still need to fix Île de Ré, otherwise looks good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah, fixed. There was a redirect on the English spelling, so I didn't notice. auntieruth (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Does anyone provide an explanation how he was able to serve both the Bourbons and Napoleon without penalty?
    Not really. It sounds as if he was a very capable manager. And a lot of them made the transition from Napoleon to the Bourbons fairly seamlessly. Ney is one of the exceptions.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    No picture available?
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: