Metropolitan Council (Minnesota)
 | |
| Agency overview | |
|---|---|
| Formed | 1967 |
| Type | Regional government and Metropolitan planning organization |
| Jurisdiction | Twin Cities |
| Agency executive |
|
| Website | www |
The Metropolitan Council, commonly abbreviated Met Council or Metro Council, is the regional governmental agency and metropolitan planning organization in Minnesota serving the Twin Cities seven-county metropolitan area, accounting for over 55 percent of the state's population.
The Met Council is granted regional authority powers in state statutes by the Minnesota Legislature. These powers are unique in that unlike the Regional Development Commissions they can supersede decisions and actions of local governments. The legislature created the Metro Council to maintain public services, oversee growth of the state's largest metro area and to act as the regional planning organization. Like the Metro in Portland, Oregon, it also administers an urban growth boundary.
The Council's role in the Twin Cities metro area is defined by the necessary regional services it provides and manages. These include public transportation, sewage treatment, regional planning, urban planning for municipalities, forecasting population growth, ensuring adequate affordable housing, maintaining a regional park and trails system, and "provides a framework for regional systems including aviation, transportation, parks and open space, water quality and water management."[1]
Governance and structure[edit]
The Met Council currently has 17 members, 16 of which represent a geographic district in the seven-county area with one chair who serves at large. All members are appointed by the Governor of Minnesota and are reappointed with each new governor in office.[2] The Minnesota Senate may confirm or reject each appointment.
The seven counties in the Council's Twin Cities Metropolitan Area are Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington counties.
Geographic districts vary in characteristics but were historically drawn by population percentage and the presence of major natural resources. Districts near the downtown core are much smaller while the edge districts encompass large amounts of rural land. For example, District 3 contains almost all of Lake Minnetonka and its tributaries and watershed.
The Met Council employs about 4,300 people, and their wages are publicly accessible.
Duties[edit]
General duties[edit]
The Council delivers regional services to communities and the public through these divisions and operating areas:
- Regional Administration/Chair's Office – Generally sets the goals and direction the Council will take with the metro area. It also manages finances and makes budget decisions on how shared funding and grant programs are distributed amongst the region.
- Community Development – The majority of land use, regional, urban, and community planning occur with this division. It also develops and administers regional and municipal frameworks as well as the long-range vision plans.
- Transportation – This division includes Metro Transit, the authority that provides most bus service and operates light rail and commuter rail lines. Metropolitan Transportation Services (MTS) includes the staff that support the Council's role as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the region. It also analyzes and develops future transportation options. However, road and street corridor planning is left to county and city governments. The metropolitan highway system is planned in coordination with the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Additional public transit agencies also exist under an agreement in state law that allows them to "opt-out" of Metro Transit service. The largest agencies are Southwest Metro Transit in the west and Minnesota Valley Transportation Authority in the south.[3][4]
- Environmental Services – MCES is mandated to address water quality, water supply, and sewage treatment. It also has full jurisdiction of the wastewater treatment system (within the MUSA boundary). This includes maintenance and construction of wastewater interceptors and operation of seven wastewater treatment plants throughout the metro area. Treatment of drinking water and storm run-off water management are left to municipalities.
- Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) – While not a division, the MUSA is an urban growth boundary which instead of limiting development, limits the services and infrastructure needed for development. Its most important service is the sewage treatment system. Growth is controlled because state law prohibits septic tank systems, and most cities require development to be connected to a system.
Tax sharing[edit]
The council's most distinctive authority is its ability to tax and share the tax revenue between municipalities through the Minnesota Fiscal Disparities Program.[5] This program, first implemented in 1975, made the Twin Cities region the first region to attempt tax-base sharing in the country.[6] The funds are then largely redistributed back to the localities with lower than average market value of property per capita.[6]
History[edit]
In 1967 the Minnesota Legislature created the Metropolitan Council in response to growing issues of septic tank wastewater contamination.[2] At the time, the region consisted of "172 cities, 97 townships, and 76 school districts".[2] The region also faced issues with a deteriorating privately-owned bus system.[2][7]
Additional acts of the legislature passed in 1974, 1976, and 1994 expanded the role and powers of the Met Council, merging it with transit and waste control commissions to become a unified regional authority.[2] The Met Council also gained the authority to approve or disapprove of municipal development plans and to manage the region's affordable housing programs.[2]
Current efforts are ongoing to transfer responsibility of a light‑rail project connecting Minneapolis to some of the region's suburbs from the Met Council to Minnesota's Department of Transportation.[8] The council has controversially overseen the almost $3 billion project while it has been delayed an additional four years and as costs rose $450 million to $550 million.[8]
Chairs[edit]
| Chair | Term | Appointed by |
|---|---|---|
| James L. Hetland Jr. | 1967 – 1971 | Harold LeVander |
| Albert Hofstede | 1971 – 1973 | Wendell Anderson |
| John E. Boland | 1973 – 1979 | Wendell Anderson |
| Charles R. Weaver Sr. | 1979 – 1982 | Al Quie |
| Gerald J. Isaacs | 1983 – 1984 | Rudy Perpich |
| Sandra S. Gardebring | 1984 – 1986 | Rudy Perpich |
| Steve Keefe | 1986 – 1991 | Rudy Perpich |
| Mary E. Anderson | 1991 – 1992 | Arne Carlson |
| Dottie Rietow | 1992 – 1995 | Arne Carlson |
| Curtis W. Johnson | 1995 – 1999 | Arne Carlson |
| Ted Mondale | 1999 – 2003 | Jesse Ventura |
| Peter Bell | 2003 – 2011 | Tim Pawlenty |
| Susan Haigh | 2011 – 2015 | Mark Dayton |
| Adam Duininck | 2015 – 2017 | Mark Dayton |
| Alene Tchourumoff | 2017 – 2019 | Mark Dayton |
| Nora Slawik | 2019 – 2020 | Tim Walz |
| Charlie Zelle | 2020 – | Tim Walz |
Controversy[edit]
The Met Council has long raised the ire of suburban residents in the region.[2] For instance, one source of controversy has been the council's power to invalidate the land use plans of municipalities which conflict with its own.[9]
In 2004, the city of Lake Elmo refused to allow higher‑density development despite the Met Council's comprehensive development guide.[10] The city challenged the Council's statutory authority to compel the city to modify its comprehensive plan in order to reach minimum density levels.[11] However, the Minnesota Supreme Court found the city's argument unpersuasive "when viewed against the plain and unambiguous language of the statutes at issue."[11]
Shortly after the Minnesota elections, 2010, Minnesota Legislative Auditor James Nobles recommended on January 21, 2011, that "the Legislature should restructure the governance of the Metropolitan Council" (page 41).[12] The Legislative Auditor continued stating that "Maintaining an appointed Met Council would continue the Council's accountability problems ... Because Council members are appointed by the governor, however, they are not directly accountable to the public for (their) decisions." This lack of credibility and accountability was reported on by newspapers such as the St. Paul Pioneer Press,[13] the Star Tribune,[14] and online editorials like Politics In Minnesota.[15]
Marty Seifert, a Republican candidate for governor in the 2014 election, also called for the abolition of the Council, citing it as an unelected authority with taxation powers without representation.[16] However, most of the responsibilities of the Metropolitan Council would still need to be maintained, including a Metropolitan Planning Organization that allows the region to receive federal transportation funding.
Criticisms of the council reached a high point in 2018 when the Met Council survived two attempted reforms at both the state and the federal level.[17]
References[edit]
- ^ "/ – Metropolitan Council". Metrocouncil.org. April 28, 2017. Retrieved October 29, 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f g Brendan Ballou, Note, A Future for the Met Council, 12 U. St. Thomas L.J. 131, 131, 135 (2015).
- ^ Met Council (February 2006). "Transit centers help attract new riders, boost system efficiency". Archived from the original on November 20, 2008. Retrieved September 21, 2007.
- ^ Steven Hauser. "Testing Inter-System Usability of Opt Out Transit Systems and Transportation". Retrieved September 21, 2007.
- ^ See Gerald E. Frug, Beyond Regional Government, 115 Harv. L. Rev. 1763, 1777 (2002) ("Regional revenue sharing, however, is the Minneapolis-St. Paul area's most distinctive metropolitan feature.").
- ^ a b Myron Orfield & Nicholas Wallace, The Minnesota Fiscal Disparities Act of 1971: The Twin Cities' Struggle and Blueprint for Regional Cooperation, 33 WM. Mitchell L. Rev. 591, 591–92 (2007).
- ^ Susan Haigh, The Metropolitan Council, 40 WM. Mitchell L. Rev. 160, 164 (2013) (stating that the issues consisted of leaking private septic systems in the suburbs, a disintegrating bus system, the loss of environmental assets to development, and tax disparities between municipalities).
- ^ a b Janet Moore, Bill Would Transfer Southwest Light‑Rail Project from Met Council to MnDOT, Star Tribune (February 9, 2022, 9:00 PM), https://www.startribune.com/bill-would-transfer-southwest-light-rail-project-from-met-council-to-mndot/600144936/ .
- ^ Ballou, supra, at 137.
- ^ See Lake Elmo v. Metro. Council, 685 N.W.2d 1, 1 (Minn. 2004) ("The City of Lake Elmo argues that the Council does not have the statutory authority to adopt Resolution 2003‑10 and, therefore, the resolution is not binding upon it.").
- ^ a b See Lake Elmo v. Metro. Council, 685 N.W.2d 1, 4–5 (Minn. 2004) ("Because no statutory provision explicitly grants the Council authority to order a city to reach "minimum density levels," Lake Elmo argues that the Council's practice of combining population forecasts with related system plans to dictate housing densities is impermissible and infringes on Lake Elmo's zoning authority in a manner unintended by the legislature.").
- ^ http://www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us/ped/pedrep/transit.pdf [bare URL PDF]
- ^ Hoppin, Jason (January 21, 2011). "Changes to Met Council's makeup urged in legislative auditor's report – Twin Cities". Twincities.com. Retrieved October 29, 2017.
- ^ "Ride transit? Go to parks? Use water? Her job affects you". StarTribune.com. April 28, 2015. Retrieved October 29, 2017.
- ^ Shaw, Charley (January 21, 2011). "The Paper Trail: Legislative Auditor recommends Met Council reform – Minnesota Lawyer". Politicsinminnesota.com. Retrieved October 29, 2017.
- ^ "Seifert to campaign all across Minnesota in governor race". November 26, 2013.
- ^ Peter Callaghan, A Bill to Reform the Met Council Will Probably Be Vetoed, MinnPost (May 29, 2019), https://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2018/05/bill-reform-met-council-will-probably-be-vetoed-doesnt-mean-lot-people-still/?hilite=met+council (detailing a state bill that would have turned the Met Council into an amalgamation of city and county officials plus an amendment to a federal appropriations bill that would have ended the Met Council's ability to receive federal transportation and planning funds).