MediaWiki talk:Tag-possible libel or vandalism

Link to Wikipedia:BLP[edit]

Can we link BLP to Wikipedia:BLP? --Doradus (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Use of undefined acronyms is poor practice. I was not familiar with "BLP," and it took a fair amount of searching to figure out what it meant. GPS Pilot (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Palosirkka (talk) 16:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

‹ The template below (Edit fully-protected) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Done Tra (Talk) 16:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 22 December 2015[edit]

‹ The template below (Edit fully-protected) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Delete the page, it is easily to define what vandalism is. Libel obviously refers to BLP, no need for a page with nothing else but "possible BLP violation or vandalism" or the such. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 22:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: This would effectively deactivate the label - see also MediaWiki talk:Tag-repeating characters#Protected edit request on 22 December 2015. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 07:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]