Draft talk:Wasabi (Little Mix song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copying Long Comments from AFC[edit]

  • Comment: This version of the draft shows that the song has been certified silver in the United Kingdom. Records which have been certified gold or platinum are considered to satisfy musical notability.
    This version of the draft shows that the song charted in New Zealand. The musical notability criteria state that a song which has been on a national chart may be considered notable, but that songs are often not considered individually notable. This means that the musical notability criteria, when read carefully, do not say that this song is notable, and they do not say that this song is not notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Needs reviews as a single not as part of an album track review. Also need to specify that it charted in the lead paragraph. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 03:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: why can't i find this song on the Irish Charts? Which edition did it show up? AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Please remove Daily Mail and Genius from the sources. Need to list in the lead paragraphs that it charted. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The song is individually notable for it became a topic for the general public and the media ever since it was released even up to this day. It became relevant to the band, the fanbase, and the media, and became well-known through out the entire era of LM5 for the controversies and noise it caused for having messages against the media and haters of the band. It also charted in 2 different countries. It will be a massive help to the people whose interested in finding nore information about the song, thus making it individually notable.
    This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.
    You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.
    See the song notability criteria, which indicate that individual songs are normally not considered notable even if the band and the album are notable. If this draft is resubmitted, please indicate, in AFC comments or on the draft talk page, how the song is individually notable.
    This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.
    You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer Note[edit]

Accepting after discussion with author. We are aware that there may be an AFD discussion, but are ready to let the community decide in that case. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]