Draft talk:The functional unit of neural circuits

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Draft	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Artificial Intelligence

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles

Meaning for A.I. research of the presented model of the functional unit of neural circuits[edit]

I suggest placing in Wikipedia an entry related to the definition, reasoning and meaning for A.I. of the functional unit of neural circuits

- as it is a concept derived from very early concepts of research on artificial intelligence and at the same time of great importance for

the future development of the most advanced artificial intelligence systems. This current meaning of the presented model of a functional unit of neuronal circuits results from the fact that few researchers attach importance to the physical existence in the brain cortex of the recurrent connections that form the basis of back propagation algorithms. These feedback connections, in turn, make it possible to understand why theories linking the essence of consciousness with the generation of the endogenous electromagnetic field of the brain are so important and convincing. Anneuroscientist (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://basiclearning.angelfire.com/equimerec-2.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am very glad that Diannaa wrote on: [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anneuroscientist ] as follow: { As far as I can tell there are no further copyright issues. — Diannaa (talk) 12:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC) } Anneuroscientist (talk) 12:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]