Draft talk:Lee keon jae

What should I write for Lee keon jae to be registered?[edit]

Is it possible to provide feedback on any parts that are needed or lacking? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 01:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to:

Declare your COI, please read WP:COI
Use the correct reference formatting
Find secondary refs that are completely independent
Ask on the TeaHouse for some help to remove your other draft.

Ldm1954 (talk) 04:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much!

I've just finished editing, but are there any more missing parts? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest looking at the following for ideas, noting my comments

Keum-Shik Hong a bit long and wordy, could be shorter
Paik Un-gyu references should be translated
Yang Ji-won should use infobox scientist
John M. Cowley an excellent page, short sharp and too the point without fluff
John C. H. Spence also good, a little long-winded

Ldm1954 (talk) 06:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much :)!

I modified it based on your reference. Is there anything else that needs to be modified? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 08:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't see all the changes done, and a lot more is needed:

No COI statement on you user page or here
~~External links are formatted wrong~~
PhD link just goes to an alumni page, not his PhD
The high school link only proves the existence of the school, not that he attended it.
The Research experience section has only one source, and also WP:PEACOCK terms such as "innovation"

You have to construct this with as much care an attention to details as you would use for a submission to Nature. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you need independent sources, one less linked to you. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much!!!

COI was mentioned, and external links were also modified. Is there anything else missing? Kaist Keon Lee (talk) 01:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a referee, when an author ignores the requested changes without justification I view it as an insult and normally recommend rejection. I do not think you are reading what I said, and I am not going to repeat myself. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]