Draft talk:Jack Chambers (choreographer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Larry Miller (entertainer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1b[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Chambers (entertainer)Jack Chambers (choreographer) – (unbundled as requested). Straightforward, known in sources as "choreographer Jack Chambers" vs "entertainer Jack Chambers" = zero. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support; "(entertainer)" is always a bad way to title an article, and all articles titled that way should be moved to another title. I suppose there will never be a consensus for moving certain present articles, but they are still wrong. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I disagree with the IP editor above, as some people are probably best described that way. Jack doesn't seem to be one of them. Red Slash 01:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Seems to be about equally notable as dancer, choreographer, and actor. "Entertainer" seems to fit the bill. Dohn joe (talk) 01:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean by "Straightforward" is per WP:AT CRITERIA 2. Naturalness – The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such titles usually convey what the subject is actually called in English.. What is your evidence that (entertainer) is what the subject is naturally called in WP:AT guidelines? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.