Draft talk:Giantology

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Folklore Low‑importance

	This page falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the page attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
Low	This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of Draft:Giantology

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This draft was nominated for deletion on 15 May 2023. The result of the discussion was delete.

Did you know nomination[edit]

Not a neologism[edit]

Wood's book is available on line in any event. Given its use in 1868, certainly not a "neologism" by any stretch of the definition.^[1] A recurrent theme and subject in newspapers since the 19th and into the 21st centuries.^[2] 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gigantology is 1811 in English, earlier in French, and in dictionaries. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ Wood, Edward J. (1868). Giants and Dwarfs. London: R. Bentley.
^ Lepper, Brad (27 December 2020). "Archaeology: Newspapers have been debunking giant hoaxes for a long time". The Columbus Dispatch. USA TODAY NETWORK. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2023. In 1862, Mark Twain was so fed up with all the sensationalistic fake news circulating in newspapers at the time that he wrote a satirical article about the discovery of a petrified man in Nevada: 'Every limb and feature of the stony mummy was perfect … the right thumb resting against the side of the nose … and the fingers of the right hand spread apart.'

[1] Wood, Edward J. (1868). Giants and Dwarfs. London: R. Bentley.

[2] Lepper, Brad (27 December 2020). "Archaeology: Newspapers have been debunking giant hoaxes for a long time". The Columbus Dispatch. USA TODAY NETWORK. Archived from the original on 27 October 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2023. In 1862, Mark Twain was so fed up with all the sensationalistic fake news circulating in newspapers at the time that he wrote a satirical article about the discovery of a petrified man in Nevada: 'Every limb and feature of the stony mummy was perfect … the right thumb resting against the side of the nose … and the fingers of the right hand spread apart.'

[1]

[2]