Draft talk:Claudia Reh

Arts Draft‑class

	Arts portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles
Draft	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography Draft‑class

	Biography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Draft	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Missing sources?[edit]

added 13 References. Enough sources now? --Schwijker (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've left this info on your talk as well, but am posting here as well in the event that other editors may see it. Reliable sources are things like secondary sources such as newspaper articles (not press releases, but articles or reviews with a byline and content not based on a press release); magazine articles or reviews (for example in ARTFORUM magazine, Frieze, etc.) or articles in academic journals that are fully vetted and peer-reviewed; chapters in books from notable publishers. Unfortunately none of the citations you added in good faith to the article are considered reliable sources per Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. What are needed are secondary sources that are in-depth, significant coverage in reliable published sources that are fully independent of the person. Below is an analysis of why the current sourcing does not meet WP guidelines:

Not independent: Calendar listing for an event [1]
Not a reliable source: Blog [2]
Not independent: Press release, not an independent article or review about her or her work [3]
Not independent: Calendar listing [4]
Not independent: Festival route map [5]
Not independent: Festival route map [6]
Not independent: Press release [7]
Not independent: Festival bio paragraph [8]
Not independent: Festival participant page [9]
Not independent: User-submitted material, artist’s self-published video [10]
Not independent: User-submitted material, artist’s self-published video [11]
Unreliable source: YouTube is not considered a reliable source and it’s a user-submitted entry [12]
Unreliable source: User submitted content: [13]
Flicker with pictures on it is not a reference [14]
Not independent: User submitted content bio [15]

Here are some links that may be helpful to you as you search for independent significant coverage in reliable sources: WP:N, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV. What is of critical importance are sources (references) that are high quality, the number of sources is not as important - quality, not quantity is key. Hope that helps! Netherzone (talk) 23:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]