Draft:HS2 versus a housing project.
| Submission declined on 21 January 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
HS2 versus a housing project.
Over *£100bn spent on a train (HS2) that’s replacing an existing train, it’s crazy especially as it was a cross party decision. £100bn could build approx. a third of a million houses with infrastructure. With the homeless and crowded living I think the HS2 money would have been better spent on a housing project. Such a housing project would also generate thousands of jobs plus furnishing the houses. Although I have studied politics for many years I cannot understand the logic behind such a decision. It’s a case of, it’s so easy to spend other people’s money (taxpayers money). Stop Hunger And Reduce Poverty (SHARP) is something we should all own as, “there but for the grace of God go I”. With over **4m UK residents living in poverty and the number of those being made homeless, the Govt definitely has its priorities misplaced. Monty Burn money expert.
- Conservative peer Michael Lord