Category talk:Machine learning

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconStatistics Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconRobotics Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Overfull[edit]

Could we maybe create a sub-category Category:Machine learning algorithms and move most of the algorithms there? Maybe even with sub-categories: learning algorithms, Category:Classification algorithms and such. --87.174.70.235 (talk) 07:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to do this, but it's quite messy, because certain areas such as Category:Classification algorithms, Category:Decision trees, Category:Evolutionary algorithms‎, Category:Ensemble learning already have their own categories. But we still need to organize all this better, for example with Category:Computational learning theory or something like this. There are a dozen terms from theoretical learning in here. Many could probably also just summarized somewhere as "terms used in machine learning". Also, many of the linked techniques are more or less coming from statistics, and only used in machine learning, should they really go into this category? Be bold! --Chire (talk) 16:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also: Category:Machine learning conferences and journals? Category:Concept clustering? --Chire (talk) 16:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]