Category talk:Literature stubs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconStub sorting
WikiProject iconThis category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Untitled[edit]

The entries under T should NOT include the definite article ("the")-18 September 2005

This is because of the way the {{lit-stub}} tag is formatted. It is unfortunate yet unavoidable. -- Francs2000 11:24, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So what is to be done with all the stubs with 'the' currently under the T section? Also, it seems there are a number of devotional/religious oriented books. Is the number great enough to warrant a Religion-book-stub or Rel-book-stub category? --JECompton 05:23, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vs. Book stubs[edit]

There seems to be quite a bit of overlap between this category and Category:Book stubs. And Book stubs appears to have been expanded to include a number of sub-categories. I've already had a number of articles using lit-stub be changed to book-stub. Is there any point to having this category of stub anymore? 23skidoo 12:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Besides serviving as a parent stub type, there are also subtopics other than books that haven't yet garnered enough stubs for a category of their own. Caerwine 21:56, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Next stub split?[edit]

I don't think we need one right now, but there's a discussion over at WP:SFD over {{India-lit-stub}}, {{Tamil-lit-stub}} and {{Classical Tamil-stub}}. Until now literature stubs have been split by genre or format (book, story, etc.); should we start looking at splitting it by region, country, nationality? Cheers, Her Pegship (tis herself) 22:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]