User talk:Tj24hours

May 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles, as you did to Applied Digital Solutions. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Twalls (talk) 18:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello Tj24hours. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tj24hours. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tj24hours|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 19:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The nature of my edits? What are you talking about? I saw a reference from 2015 & 2018 were outdated and referencing old material and submitted the necessary change. I didn't post anything spamming or anything close. I'm not being compensated for this edit. If you look through my past edits, they are usually updating old material.

April 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Third-party logistics, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Kuru (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

trafficmgmt.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.trafficmgmt.com

/* April 2021 */ Please take a look at reference (16) <-- this is the previous link. See where it takes you. https://web.archive.org/web/20201216234635/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_logistics I am not spamming and only updated a link that I knew what no longer active. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tj24hours (talk • contribs)

Neither the original link nor the new version should be cited. Wikipedia does not use marketing materials such as vendor blogs as sources. - MrOllie (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the links in this article are to companies and article/blog posts. Apparently the "smile and dial" quote/terminology was significant one point so someone added the reference. I only updated it to the current link. Maybe the "smile and dial" needs it's own page but this isn't my jam. I'm only here to fix errors when I see them, which I need. Please accept the error edit as it better reflects actual information. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tj24hours (talk • contribs)

Yes, there were several inappropriate links in that article. They were removed, and then you started edit warring to put them back in for some reason. Please have a read of WP:RS - the way to fix errors with inappropriate sources is to remove them, not update them. - MrOllie (talk) 13:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]